Thread: Some PG stats in SD Times article
Folks, I found this part of this article interesting: http://sdtimes.com/news/105/story15.htm "Top Deployed Databases. When respondents were asked which databases were in use at their company, the lion's share went to Microsoft, with 78 percent saying that SQL Server was deployed. It was followed closely by Oracle, at 55 percent, and surprisingly by MySQL, at 33 percent. Next were IBM's DB2, at 22 percent; Sybase, at 15 percent; and PostgreSQL, at 8 percent. Readers were presented with a field of 14 major databases for this question. Database for Current Project. The same list of databases was used for a related question, which asked which specific database was used on the respondent's current or most recent project. The top rankings were similar, with Microsoft at the top with SQL Server, at 57 percent; followed by Oracle, at 39 percent; MySQL, at 16 percent; and DB2, at 11 percent. PostgreSQL, at 5 percent, however, edged out Sybase, at 4 percent, for the fifth position." So among SD Times 1,000 subscribers, we're the 4th or 5th most popular database, and between 5% and 8% of the market. This is a useful stat to throw at people. 5-8% of the market may not seem like much, but it's better than Apple is doing in the PC market, and means potentially tens of thousands of production installations. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:19, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > I found this part of this article interesting: > > http://sdtimes.com/news/105/story15.htm > <snip stats> > So among SD Times 1,000 subscribers, we're the 4th or 5th most popular > database, and between 5% and 8% of the market. This is a useful stat to > throw at people. 5-8% of the market may not seem like much, but it's better > than Apple is doing in the PC market, and means potentially tens of thousands > of production installations. > And in current projects were actually beating out a commercial vendor, so that is a positive sign. I thought the last part was equally telling as well: "Reasons for Choosing Specific Databases. BZ Research asked respondents to identify the top factors, from a list of 25, that led to the choice of the database being used for their current or most recent project. The top factor, by a wide margin, was familiarity with the database, indicated by 58 percent of respondents. This was followed by the reputation of the database vendor, at 34 percent; lowest development costs, at 30 percent; lowest deployment costs, at 30 percent; and high availability/reliability features of the database, at 24 percent." ISTM that postgresql's strengths lie in almost an exact opposite order of the reasons people picked databases for deployment. That certainly is one reason why it seems like such an uphill battle in expanding postgresql adoption. The upside is of course that if we can expand the "familiarity" piece we could see a large uptake by new users, and probably nothing will help us with that goal more than the upcoming win32 port :-) Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL