Thread: Mixing DBLink versions

Mixing DBLink versions

From
David Jantzen
Date:
Hi All,

Due to some historical idiosyncracies in our environment, we have a custom 8.3.7 database installation built from
source. We'd like to install dblink into this, however there are some problems with doing so: 

1) the 8.3.7 database was built on a CentOS 4 build box that has since gone away
2) currently we have only 8.3.9 code built against CentOS 5
3) the GCC compiler on CentOS 4 was quite old
4) possible API changes in dblink between those versions

My question, how risky would it be to copy the dblink.so and .sql files from the CentOS 5 compilation of Postgres 8.3.9
overto the CentOS 4 compilation of Postgres 8.3.7?  If runtime errors result, how severe would they be?  I.e., would
theytake down a postgres backend or possibly the postmaster daemon?  

Thanks,
David

Re: Mixing DBLink versions

From
Tom Lane
Date:
David Jantzen <djantzen@ql2.com> writes:
> Due to some historical idiosyncracies in our environment, we have a custom 8.3.7 database installation built from
source. We'd like to install dblink into this, however there are some problems with doing so: 

> 1) the 8.3.7 database was built on a CentOS 4 build box that has since gone away
> 2) currently we have only 8.3.9 code built against CentOS 5
> 3) the GCC compiler on CentOS 4 was quite old
> 4) possible API changes in dblink between those versions

> My question, how risky would it be to copy the dblink.so and .sql files from the CentOS 5 compilation of Postgres
8.3.9over to the CentOS 4 compilation of Postgres 8.3.7?  If runtime errors result, how severe would they be?  I.e.,
wouldthey take down a postgres backend or possibly the postmaster daemon?  

I think you've got a fundamental problem that you'd better fix.  If you
are unable to rebuild the database from source then you are unable to
update --- and you are already three minor versions behind and missing
multiple security and crash-risk bug fixes.  You're living on borrowed
time, and NEED to reinstantiate your ability to build for that platform.
Or move to a newer one.

FWIW, you could probably get back a RHEL4 build environment pretty
cheaply by setting up a suitable "mock" chroot on a recent Fedora
version (installed on the same type of hardware).

As for your direct question: no, I wouldn't count on that to work.
RHEL4 and RHEL5 had different glibc versions didn't they?

            regards, tom lane

Re: Mixing DBLink versions

From
David Jantzen
Date:
Thanks for the detailed response.  We'll look at upgrading to 8.3.9 from an RPM.

On Mar 15, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> David Jantzen <djantzen@ql2.com> writes:
>> Due to some historical idiosyncracies in our environment, we have a custom 8.3.7 database installation built from
source. We'd like to install dblink into this, however there are some problems with doing so: 
>
>> 1) the 8.3.7 database was built on a CentOS 4 build box that has since gone away
>> 2) currently we have only 8.3.9 code built against CentOS 5
>> 3) the GCC compiler on CentOS 4 was quite old
>> 4) possible API changes in dblink between those versions
>
>> My question, how risky would it be to copy the dblink.so and .sql files from the CentOS 5 compilation of Postgres
8.3.9over to the CentOS 4 compilation of Postgres 8.3.7?  If runtime errors result, how severe would they be?  I.e.,
wouldthey take down a postgres backend or possibly the postmaster daemon?  
>
> I think you've got a fundamental problem that you'd better fix.  If you
> are unable to rebuild the database from source then you are unable to
> update --- and you are already three minor versions behind and missing
> multiple security and crash-risk bug fixes.  You're living on borrowed
> time, and NEED to reinstantiate your ability to build for that platform.
> Or move to a newer one.
>
> FWIW, you could probably get back a RHEL4 build environment pretty
> cheaply by setting up a suitable "mock" chroot on a recent Fedora
> version (installed on the same type of hardware).
>
> As for your direct question: no, I wouldn't count on that to work.
> RHEL4 and RHEL5 had different glibc versions didn't they?
>
>             regards, tom lane


Re: Mixing DBLink versions

From
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 19:25 -0700, David Jantzen wrote:
> We'll look at upgrading to 8.3.9 from an RPM.

FWIW 8.3.10 was released today.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

Attachment