Thread: pg_restore speed
Hi: I have a 90G postgis-enabled postgresql database that I'm upgrading from 8.1.5 to 8.2.1. I initiated pg_restore nearly six days ago and it's still churning away, surely but slowly. Is this amount of time normal? Or have I done something wrong? Any help is appreciated! Thanks
Colton A Smith wrote: > Hi: > > I have a 90G postgis-enabled postgresql > database that I'm upgrading from 8.1.5 to > 8.2.1. I initiated pg_restore nearly > six days ago and it's still churning away, > surely but slowly. Is this amount of > time normal? Or have I done something > wrong? 6 days seems like an awful long time I could see 12-15 hours. What type of machine do you have? What was the pg_dump command you used and respective pg_restore? > > Any help is appreciated! > > Thanks > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Colton A Smith wrote: >> I have a 90G postgis-enabled postgresql >> database that I'm upgrading from 8.1.5 to >> 8.2.1. I initiated pg_restore nearly >> six days ago and it's still churning away, >> surely but slowly. Is this amount of >> time normal? Or have I done something >> wrong? > 6 days seems like an awful long time I could see 12-15 hours. What type > of machine do you have? What was the pg_dump command you used and > respective pg_restore? What is the restore actually doing at the moment? (Look in pg_stat_activity) For such a large DB I'd think you'd really need to increase shared_buffers, checkpoint_segments, and maintenance_work_mem well beyond their default values ... did you do that before starting to restore? (Actually I think you could probably do the latter two on-the-fly without disturbing the restore, so that might be something to try before giving up and starting over.) regards, tom lane