Thread: pgpool and ABORT
I'm using pgpool in a fairly high-traffic environment, and I regularly get this warning from pgpool calling ABORT: WARNING: there is no transaction in progress I found this post in the archives: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-04/msg01154.php But the README for pgpool asserts: Note that "ABORT" will not be issued if the backend is 7.4 or later and the session is not in a transaction block. I'm just curious why I'm still seeing the ABORTs if these sessions are not in a transaction block. I'm running postgres 7.4.6 and pgpool 2.5.1. -tfo -- Thomas F. O'Connell Co-Founder, Information Architect Sitening, LLC http://www.sitening.com/ 110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6 Nashville, TN 37203-6320 615-260-0005