Thread: Unsupported frontend protocol
pgAdmin III devel 0.9.1 August 24th PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on Redhat 7.2 GCC 2.96 I am getting the following type of messages in the server log file when using pgAdmin III. >Sep 18 09:31:00 CISX_Linux1 postgres[32277]: [2] FATAL: unsupported frontend protocol It does not stop pgAdmin from running in any way, but am just curious in case it is some sort of bug. My guess is that pgAdmin starts using the new 7.4 protocol and when that fails it falls back to using an older protocol - would that be correct? TIA Donald
Donald Fraser wrote: >pgAdmin III devel 0.9.1 August 24th >PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on Redhat 7.2 GCC 2.96 > >I am getting the following type of messages in the server log file when using >pgAdmin III. > > > >>Sep 18 09:31:00 CISX_Linux1 postgres[32277]: [2] FATAL: unsupported frontend >> >> >protocol > >It does not stop pgAdmin from running in any way, but am just curious in case >it is some sort of bug. >My guess is that pgAdmin starts using the new 7.4 protocol and when that fails >it falls back to using an older protocol - would that be correct? > > This is my guess too, but I haven't looked at details. You could ask on pgsql-hackers for more. Regards, Andreas
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 18 September 2003 16:25 > To: Donald Fraser > Cc: [pgADMIN] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Unsupported frontend protocol > > > Donald Fraser wrote: > > >pgAdmin III devel 0.9.1 August 24th > >PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on Redhat 7.2 GCC 2.96 > > > >I am getting the following type of messages in the server > log file when > >using pgAdmin III. > > > > > > > >>Sep 18 09:31:00 CISX_Linux1 postgres[32277]: [2] FATAL: unsupported > >>frontend > >> > >> > >protocol > > > >It does not stop pgAdmin from running in any way, but am > just curious > >in case it is some sort of bug. My guess is that pgAdmin > starts using > >the new 7.4 protocol and when that fails it falls back to using an > >older protocol - would that be correct? > > > > > > This is my guess too, but I haven't looked at details. You > could ask on > pgsql-hackers for more. > Yes, this is what happens. Regards, Dave