Thread: pgadmin III connection dialogue: cannot change options

pgadmin III connection dialogue: cannot change options

From
Troels Arvin
Date:
Hello,

>From latest CVS    checkout:

When trying to connect to a server (the "connect to server" dialogue),
it seems that the connection options (like user name) cannot be changed.
Current work-around: Remove the connection and create a new one with
other parameters.

-- 
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark


Re: pgadmin III connection dialogue: cannot change options

From
"Dave Page"
Date:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troels Arvin [mailto:troels@arvin.dk]
> Sent: 15 July 2003 12:01
> To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] pgadmin III connection dialogue:
> cannot change options
>
>
> Hello,
>
> >From latest CVS    checkout:
>
> When trying to connect to a server (the "connect to server"
> dialogue), it seems that the connection options (like user
> name) cannot be changed. Current work-around: Remove the
> connection and create a new one with other parameters.

That's by design (and has always been that way).

Regards, Dave.


Re: pgadmin III connection dialogue: cannot change

From
Andreas Pflug
Date:
Troels Arvin wrote:

>Hello,
>
>>From latest CVS    checkout:
>
>When trying to connect to a server (the "connect to server" dialogue),
>it seems that the connection options (like user name) cannot be changed.
>
That' right, but why change parameters? Do you do that regularly? If you 
need more than one user, why not creating more connections.

Regards,
Andreas



Re: pgadmin III connection dialogue: cannot

From
Troels Arvin
Date:
Hello,

On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 13:12, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >When trying to connect to a server (the "connect to server" dialogue),
> >it seems that the connection options (like user name) cannot be changed.
> >
> That' right, but why change parameters? Do you do that regularly? If you 
> need more than one user, why not creating more connections.

You may have a point. But maybe the dialogue could be changed, then? - In a way where the fields don't look like they
areeditable (but still cut-and-past'able, if possible)?
 

-- 
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark