Thread: Some website tweaks
A couple of minor things bothered me about the current site, have fixed them in a local copy and published the changes: http://sites.shishnet.org:8088 https://github.com/shish/pgadmin-www Specifically: - CSS has been deduplicated (one base file with pretty much everything in it, then rtl and ltr files which contain only the text-direction-specific tweaks) - Top menus made all boxy, rather than part-boxy-part-listy - The background colour boxes when hovering over the top menu entries were very tightly wrapped around the text; I've made them fill the whole box - Screenshots index has them side-by-side instead of a long list with lots of whitespace and scrolling - Link to Suse 10 XGL screenshot commented out, because 2005 called and asked to have its embarassing photos removed :P I'm also considering updating the screenshots themselves, because Windows XP and 90's-style Solaris desktops at 800x600 don't exactly scream "this software project is alive and up-to-date", but that's more effort so I figured I'd see if anyone cares first -- Shish
Hi On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Shish <shish@shishnet.org> wrote: > A couple of minor things bothered me about the current site, have fixed them > in a local copy and published the changes: > > http://sites.shishnet.org:8088 > https://github.com/shish/pgadmin-www > > Specifically: > - CSS has been deduplicated (one base file with pretty much everything in > it, then rtl and ltr files which contain only the text-direction-specific > tweaks) > - Top menus made all boxy, rather than part-boxy-part-listy > - The background colour boxes when hovering over the top menu entries were > very tightly wrapped around the text; I've made them fill the whole box > - Screenshots index has them side-by-side instead of a long list with lots > of whitespace and scrolling > - Link to Suse 10 XGL screenshot commented out, because 2005 called and > asked to have its embarassing photos removed :P LOL!! Can you send a patch against git-head please? > I'm also considering updating the screenshots themselves, because Windows XP > and 90's-style Solaris desktops at 800x600 don't exactly scream "this > software project is alive and up-to-date", but that's more effort so I > figured I'd see if anyone cares first I think it's safe to say that a number of us care, but have an endless queue of higher priority items to care about :-(. I'm happy to accept appropriate patches though, if you are able to put the effort in. Thanks! -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> Can you send a patch against git-head please? I'm not sure how you like your patches, have attached something which is a patch of some sort, from git head to my own head. Individual changes are in the repo --> https://github.com/shish/pgadmin-www/commits/master >> I'm also considering updating the screenshots themselves >> [...] I figured I'd see if anyone cares first > > I'm happy to accept appropriate patches though, if you are able > to put the effort in. Thanks! Right'o; my lunch break is over, but will see if I can get round to it later :) -- Shish
Attachment
Thanks - patch applied!! On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Shish <shish@shishnet.org> wrote: >> Can you send a patch against git-head please? > > I'm not sure how you like your patches, have attached something which is a > patch of some sort, from git head to my own head. Individual changes are in > the repo --> https://github.com/shish/pgadmin-www/commits/master > > > >>> I'm also considering updating the screenshots themselves >>> [...] I figured I'd see if anyone cares first > >> >> I'm happy to accept appropriate patches though, if you are able >> to put the effort in. Thanks! > > Right'o; my lunch break is over, but will see if I can get round to it later > :) > > -- Shish -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company