Thread: pgAdmin 1.16.0 Beta 1 bundled

pgAdmin 1.16.0 Beta 1 bundled

From
Dave Page
Date:
After much hacking and fixing of build system stuff, here it is:
ftp://ftp.pgadmin.org/release/v1.16.0-beta1/src/

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: pgAdmin 1.16.0 Beta 1 bundled

From
Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:22 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> After much hacking and fixing of build system stuff, here it is:
> ftp://ftp.pgadmin.org/release/v1.16.0-beta1/src/
>

I've seen you had a lot to fix. Sorry about that.


--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com


Re: pgAdmin 1.16.0 Beta 1 bundled

From
Dave Page
Date:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:22 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> After much hacking and fixing of build system stuff, here it is:
>> ftp://ftp.pgadmin.org/release/v1.16.0-beta1/src/
>>
>
> I've seen you had a lot to fix. Sorry about that.

No problem - it happens every year. I really must get round to writing
a regression test script that will build a tarball every day, then try
building from that. You don't see missing image and header references
in makefiles otherwise (because they only need to be on disk for the
build, but in the makefile to get in the tarball).


--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: pgAdmin 1.16.0 Beta 1 bundled

From
Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 21:38 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:22 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> After much hacking and fixing of build system stuff, here it is:
> >> ftp://ftp.pgadmin.org/release/v1.16.0-beta1/src/
> >>
> >
> > I've seen you had a lot to fix. Sorry about that.
>
> No problem - it happens every year. I really must get round to writing
> a regression test script that will build a tarball every day, then try
> building from that.

That would be handy.

>  You don't see missing image and header references
> in makefiles otherwise (because they only need to be on disk for the
> build, but in the makefile to get in the tarball).


--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com