Thread: pgAdmin III commit: Beautify SQL code for comments and owners
Beautify SQL code for comments and owners Branch ------ REL-1_14_0_PATCHES Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=514d8f56f02910ff67c281eb5d98ebe5d6a15ce7 Author: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> Modified Files -------------- pgadmin/dlg/dlgProperty.cpp | 2 +- pgadmin/schema/pgObject.cpp | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
This isn't a bug fix, so really shouldn't be applied during beta. On Friday, July 8, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Beautify SQL code for comments and owners > > Branch > ------ > REL-1_14_0_PATCHES > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=514d8f56f02910ff67c281eb5d98ebe5d6a15ce7 > Author: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> > > Modified Files > -------------- > pgadmin/dlg/dlgProperty.cpp | 2 +- > pgadmin/schema/pgObject.cpp | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > -- > Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 21:11 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > This isn't a bug fix, so really shouldn't be applied during beta. > Well, it's not a new feature, it's not a bugfix, it's in-between. Strictly speaking, you're probably right. I can revert the patch if you want, it's no big deal. But I mean, I just added three \n. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com