Thread: Transactions in status view
Hi! In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular transactions don't show up there. I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"? "Prepared transactions"? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Hi! > > In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is > labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase > transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular > transactions don't show up there. > > I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"? > "Prepared transactions"? The latter sounds good to me. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is >> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase >> transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular >> transactions don't show up there. >> >> I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"? >> "Prepared transactions"? > > The latter sounds good to me. > +1 for "prepared transactions". -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit : >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is >>> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase >>> transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular >>> transactions don't show up there. >>> >>> I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"? >>> "Prepared transactions"? >> >> The latter sounds good to me. >> > > +1 for "prepared transactions". Where are we wrt the new release - are we in string freeze or is it ok to make this change now? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Le 17/06/2010 14:52, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit : >>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is >>>> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase >>>> transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular >>>> transactions don't show up there. >>>> >>>> I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"? >>>> "Prepared transactions"? >>> >>> The latter sounds good to me. >>> >> >> +1 for "prepared transactions". > > Where are we wrt the new release - are we in string freeze or is it ok > to make this change now? > You can make this change. We're not in string freeze. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 15:30, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 17/06/2010 14:52, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit : >>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is >>>>> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase >>>>> transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular >>>>> transactions don't show up there. >>>>> >>>>> I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"? >>>>> "Prepared transactions"? >>>> >>>> The latter sounds good to me. >>>> >>> >>> +1 for "prepared transactions". >> >> Where are we wrt the new release - are we in string freeze or is it ok >> to make this change now? >> > > You can make this change. We're not in string freeze. Great. Done! -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/