Thread: Proportions of dialog windows
Hi developers! Testing the pgAdmin III 1.8.0 Beta 3 (Aug 22 2007, rev: 6580). Client Win XP, host: Debian Etch / PG 8.2.4 and Debian Sarge / PG 8.1.8 The properties dialog window for functions is a bit out of proportion (width, height). Also, the comment field there could use a bit more space. Maybe not as much as tables or views, but a couple of lines more? Same for trigger functions: window is extremely wide. Window for views is a bit wide. All other object types seem to get perfectly fitting dialog windows. (I think I check most of them.) Regards Erwin
Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > Hi developers! > > Testing the pgAdmin III 1.8.0 Beta 3 (Aug 22 2007, rev: 6580). Client > Win XP, host: Debian Etch / PG 8.2.4 and Debian Sarge / PG 8.1.8 > > The properties dialog window for functions is a bit out of proportion > (width, height). Thats one of the few resizeable dialogues due to the SQL box on the definition pane. The default shape/size likes reasonable here to me - perhaps you resized it in the past? Drag the bottom right corner in to the minimum size allowed (which is the default) > Also, the comment field there could use a bit more > space. Maybe not as much as tables or views, but a couple of lines more? There's not a huge amount of room on the dialogue - we have a couple of lines for the comment - i'd rather not make it any taller just to avoid a little scrolling. > Same for trigger functions: window is extremely wide. > Window for views is a bit wide. Thats the same dialogue, though it probably remembers its size independently. I do hope to redesign a few of the dialogues in the next cycle - including Functions, Package elements, Views and Tables. Regards, Dave
dpage@postgresql.org wrote: > Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > >> Hi developers! >> >> Testing the pgAdmin III 1.8.0 Beta 3 (Aug 22 2007, rev: 6580). Client >> Win XP, host: Debian Etch / PG 8.2.4 and Debian Sarge / PG 8.1.8 >> >> The properties dialog window for functions is a bit out of proportion >> (width, height). >> > > Thats one of the few resizeable dialogues due to the SQL box on the > definition pane. The default shape/size likes reasonable here to me - > perhaps you resized it in the past? Drag the bottom right corner in to > the minimum size allowed (which is the default) > It is as you guessed. Well, that wasn't one of my brightest reports. Still not fully recovered, I guess. I forgot that my settings from the previous installation apply when I just replace the .exe file. Regards Erwin
Erwin Brandstetter wrote: > It is as you guessed. > Well, that wasn't one of my brightest reports. Still not fully > recovered, I guess. I forgot that my settings from the previous > installation apply when I just replace the .exe file. :-). Glad to see you're human!! /D