Thread: The "dependent" list shows _RULE if a view depends on something

Hi

I just noticed that the list if dependents of an
object list the _RULE, and not the view if that
objects is being used in a rule.

This is technically correct - but I think it'd
be more userfriend to show the view instead.
Would a patch for this be accepted, or is this
"by design"?

greetings, Florian Pflug

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just noticed that the list if dependents of an
> object list the _RULE, and not the view if that
> objects is being used in a rule.
>
> This is technically correct - but I think it'd
> be more userfriend to show the view instead.
> Would a patch for this be accepted, or is this
> "by design"?

I see no reason why it wouldn't be accepted.

Regards, Dave