Thread: i18n files
Hi Dave, I did quite some updates on *.mo and *.po files lately, but only for HEAD. IMHO there's no point in maintaining head and trunk for these files, since they're 100 % backward compatible. (and CHANGELOG.txt covers all changes too). Just a note before 1.4.1 is packaged with outdated versions :-) Regards, Andreas
Hi Andreas, 1.4.1 will be packaged with whatever is in the 1.4 branch. Aside from the fact that I have enough to do at release anyway(doc updates, 4 builds of pgAdmin, refreshes of everything else in pgInstaller, and it's build and testing) withouthaving to merge translations from trunk, the tags/branches in SVN should match exactly what is released to allow anybuild to be easily recreated. Plus of course, there are makefiles and build scripts to keep in sync. Regards, Dave -----Original Message----- From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 09/12/05 21:30:57 To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, "pgadmin-hackers"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: i18n files Hi Dave, I did quite some updates on *.mo and *.po files lately, but only for HEAD. IMHO there's no point in maintaining head and trunk for these files, since they're 100 % backward compatible. (and CHANGELOG.txt covers all changes too). Just a note before 1.4.1 is packaged with outdated versions :-) Regards, Andreas -----Unmodified Original Message----- Hi Dave, I did quite some updates on *.mo and *.po files lately, but only for HEAD. IMHO there's no point in maintaining head and trunk for these files, since they're 100 % backward compatible. (and CHANGELOG.txt covers all changes too). Just a note before 1.4.1 is packaged with outdated versions :-) Regards, Andreas
Dave Page wrote: >Hi Andreas, > >1.4.1 will be packaged with whatever is in the 1.4 branch. Aside from the fact that I have enough to do at release anyway(doc updates, 4 builds of pgAdmin, refreshes of everything else in pgInstaller, and it's build and testing) withouthaving to merge translations from trunk, the tags/branches in SVN should match exactly what is released to allow anybuild to be easily recreated. Plus of course, there are makefiles and build scripts to keep in sync. > > > Ok, will update releasable languages. Unfortunately, still no nordic knight in a shiny armour showed up to lift our Swedish translation from 1.0 to 1.4... :-) Regards, Andreas
Thanks. What's the knight about btw? Some bizarre fantasy of yours? :-p /D -----Original Message----- From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 09/12/05 22:09:05 To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Cc: "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Magnus Hagander"<mha@sollentuna.net> Subject: Re: i18n files Dave Page wrote: >Hi Andreas, > >1.4.1 will be packaged with whatever is in the 1.4 branch. Aside from the fact that I have enough to do at release anyway(doc updates, 4 builds of pgAdmin, refreshes of everything else in pgInstaller, and it's build and testing) withouthaving to merge translations from trunk, the tags/branches in SVN should match exactly what is released to allow anybuild to be easily recreated. Plus of course, there are makefiles and build scripts to keep in sync. > > > Ok, will update releasable languages. Unfortunately, still no nordic knight in a shiny armour showed up to lift our Swedish translation from 1.0 to 1.4... :-) Regards, Andreas -----Unmodified Original Message----- Dave Page wrote: >Hi Andreas, > >1.4.1 will be packaged with whatever is in the 1.4 branch. Aside from the fact that I have enough to do at release anyway(doc updates, 4 builds of pgAdmin, refreshes of everything else in pgInstaller, and it's build and testing) withouthaving to merge translations from trunk, the tags/branches in SVN should match exactly what is released to allow anybuild to be easily recreated. Plus of course, there are makefiles and build scripts to keep in sync. > > > Ok, will update releasable languages. Unfortunately, still no nordic knight in a shiny armour showed up to lift our Swedish translation from 1.0 to 1.4... :-) Regards, Andreas
Dave Page wrote: > Thanks. > > What's the knight about btw? Some bizarre fantasy of yours? :-p No, just waiting for a hero :-) Regards, Andreas