Thread: ParseDateTime signature change

Hi Andreas,

I've had to hack the 1.2.2 admin module to include it with pgInstaller
8.0.4 because the signature for ParseDateTime has changed (see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-05/msg00196.php).

I haven't committed any changes though as I'm unsure of the cleanest way
to fix this for all versions (and I really don't have time to
investigate ATM :-( ). Any ideas off the top of your head?

Regards, Dave.

Dave Page wrote:

>Hi Andreas,
>
>I've had to hack the 1.2.2 admin module to include it with pgInstaller
>8.0.4 because the signature for ParseDateTime has changed (see
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-05/msg00196.php).
>
>

Great...
All that comes to my mind is conditional compiling, whatever the macro
may be named that it should depend on.

Regards,
Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 04 October 2005 09:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: ParseDateTime signature change
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >Hi Andreas,
> >
> >I've had to hack the 1.2.2 admin module to include it with
> pgInstaller
> >8.0.4 because the signature for ParseDateTime has changed (see
> >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-05/msg00196.php).
> >
> >
>
> Great...
> All that comes to my mind is conditional compiling, whatever
> the macro
> may be named that it should depend on.

Yeah - I should have been a little clearer :-) Any idea what that macro
might be?

/D

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 04 October 2005 10:15
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: ParseDateTime signature change
>
>
> Nope... Ask Tom (TM)

:-)

/D