Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: Move to Subversion?

Move to Subversion?

From
"Dave Page"
Date:
I've been looking at moving pgAdmin to Subversion instead of CVS to
allow us to move file and directories etc. I've put a test installation
on svn://svn.pgadmin.org/repos/, with a web browser at
http://svn.pgadmin.org.

Thoughts, comments, objections?

Currently I quite like it. The structure and web interface is a little
confusing at first, but TortoiseSVN makes using it a breeze on Windows.

Regards, Dave.

Oh, btw, the SVN repository is a copy of CVS from earlier today. If you
view the CVS repo via the test version of viewcvs, that's the live CVS
repository.

Re: Move to Subversion?

From
"Merlin Moncure"
Date:
> Thoughts, comments, objections?
>
> Currently I quite like it. The structure and web interface is a little
> confusing at first, but TortoiseSVN makes using it a breeze on
Windows.
>
> Regards, Dave.

I was an early adopter of subversion and I'm really pleased with it.  I
don't contribute much code here, but I think it's a smart move, assuming
everybody else is ok with it.  The only thing disappointing about the
project is they seem to have lost all interest developing an SQL
backend.

The subversion-users mailing list is more active than the ten or so
pgsql mailing lists I subscribe to put together (!).


Merlin

Re: Move to Subversion?

From
"Dave Page"
Date:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Merlin Moncure
> Sent: 28 April 2005 13:31
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Move to Subversion?
>
> > Thoughts, comments, objections?
> >
> > Currently I quite like it. The structure and web interface
> is a little
> > confusing at first, but TortoiseSVN makes using it a breeze on
> Windows.
> >
> > Regards, Dave.
>
> I was an early adopter of subversion and I'm really pleased
> with it.  I
> don't contribute much code here, but I think it's a smart
> move, assuming
> everybody else is ok with it.  The only thing disappointing about the
> project is they seem to have lost all interest developing an SQL
> backend.

Great, thanks Merlin. All comments are useful whether from active
developers or experienced lurkers :-).

Regards, Dave