Thread: 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure they look OK before we announce. On a related note, has anyone started work on a release announcement yet? If not, I'll write one up tomorrow. Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new code committed :-) /D
Dave:
src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests like connecting, retrieving and updating data passed OK.
Diego.
El lun, 29-11-2004 a las 21:23 +0000, Dave Page escribió:
src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests like connecting, retrieving and updating data passed OK.
Diego.
El lun, 29-11-2004 a las 21:23 +0000, Dave Page escribió:
I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure they look OK before we announce. On a related note, has anyone started work on a release announcement yet? If not, I'll write one up tomorrow. Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new code committed :-) /D ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Thanks Diego :-)
/D
Dave:
From: Diego Gil [mailto:diego@adminsa.com]
Sent: 29 November 2004 21:48
To: Dave Page
Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests like connecting, retrieving and updating data passed OK.
Diego.
El lun, 29-11-2004 a las 21:23 +0000, Dave Page escribió:I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure they look OK before we announce. On a related note, has anyone started work on a release announcement yet? If not, I'll write one up tomorrow. Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new code committed :-) /D ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Page wrote: > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in > src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure > they look OK before we announce. RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM have been been built. They are being uploaded now -- will be available shortly. Thanks to pgadmin3 team for the great work! Regards, - -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBq5yFtl86P3SPfQ4RAgNfAJ9ZlGLSrTPsYnfWoGKPpWVNtp3PhgCg6XYF 6+HQ+54W8CepFX8+LITaZVY= =e9J1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi guys, it seems that (thanks to Ron) wxWidgets 2.5.3 as reached Debian/unstable. So, I think I'll try a proper build on top of these packages instead of trying a build on top of mine. If it works ok, these packages will be a first shot at trying to release proper pga3 packages which may enter in Debian/unstableand maybe then Debian/testing... So, you'll have to wait a little bit until I release 1.2.0 packages. Cheers, Raphaël ----Message d'origine---- >Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded >Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:57:59 -0000 >De: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> >A: "Diego Gil" <diego@adminsa.com> >Copie à: "PgAdmin Hackers" <pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> > >Thanks Diego :-) > >/D > > >________________________________ > > From: Diego Gil [mailto:diego@adminsa.com] > Sent: 29 November 2004 21:48 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PgAdmin Hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > > Dave: > > src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests like connecting, retrievingand updating data passed OK. > > Diego. > > El lun, 29-11-2004 a las 21:23 +0000, Dave Page escribió: > > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in > src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure > they look OK before we announce. > > On a related note, has anyone started work on a release announcement > yet? If not, I'll write one up tomorrow. > > Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new > code committed :-) > > /D > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > > >
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:23:49 -0000, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote: > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in > src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure > they look OK before we announce. Built fine on SUSE 9.1 and works without any obvious problems. I don't suppose there's anyone maintaining RPMs for recent SUSE versions? Ian Barwick
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:02:42 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM have been been built. How about gpg-signing the RPMs? -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
> -----Original Message----- > From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim@gunduz.org] > Sent: 29 November 2004 22:03 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Page wrote: > > > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to > http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ > > in src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check > them to make > > sure they look OK before we announce. > > RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM have been been built. They are > being uploaded now -- will be available shortly. > > Thanks to pgadmin3 team for the great work! Thanks Devrim. /D
> -----Original Message----- > From: blacknoz@club-internet.fr [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr] > Sent: 29 November 2004 23:07 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; ron@debian.org > Subject: Re: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > > Hi guys, > > it seems that (thanks to Ron) wxWidgets 2.5.3 as reached > Debian/unstable. > So, I think I'll try a proper build on top of these packages > instead of trying a build on top of mine. > If it works ok, these packages will be a first shot at trying > to release proper pga3 packages which may enter in > Debian/unstable and maybe then Debian/testing... > > So, you'll have to wait a little bit until I release 1.2.0 packages. Excellent - thanks Raph! /D
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Barwick [mailto:barwick@gmail.com] > Sent: 29 November 2004 22:24 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:23:49 -0000, Dave Page > <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote: > > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to > http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ > > in src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check > them to make > > sure they look OK before we announce. > > Built fine on SUSE 9.1 and works without any obvious problems. Great, thanks for testing. > I don't suppose there's anyone maintaining RPMs for recent > SUSE versions? Not that I'm aware of. Care to volunteer? :-) /D
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:32:09 -0000, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian Barwick [mailto:barwick@gmail.com] > > Sent: 29 November 2004 22:24 (...) > > I don't suppose there's anyone maintaining RPMs for recent > > SUSE versions? > > Not that I'm aware of. Care to volunteer? > > :-) Thought you might say that ;-). Yes I would, but I probably haven't got any time much before the end of the year. If noone else steps up before then I'll give it a go. Ian Barwick
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Barwick [mailto:barwick@gmail.com] > Sent: 30 November 2004 12:16 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > Thought you might say that ;-). Yup, well, if I don't ask, I probably won't get! > Yes I would, but I probably > haven't got any time much before the end of the year. If > noone else steps up before then I'll give it a go. OK, thanks. Regards, Dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Troels Arvin wrote:
>> RPM for Fedora Core 3 and SRPM have been been built.
>
> How about gpg-signing the RPMs?
It's very hard for me -- the servers and users that I build RPMs and use
gpg are different...
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBrQYHtl86P3SPfQ4RAuR0AJ9U6GCdVriBXk/9zO5sw5mFaMBrowCfY8Wr
YC0cQtHZtREcwUpGlkzKvoQ=
=Y8v0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:45:08 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > It's very hard for me -- the servers and users that I build RPMs and use > gpg are different... GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm parameter. -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote: > GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm > parameter. By the way: It would be nice if Dave's signature were used, as is the case for the source tar-balls. Dave: Do you have RPM on your system? - Could you add signatures to the RPM files? By the way: A freshmeat update has been submitted, so a freshmeat announcement is on its way. Now, it would be nice if the http://www.pgadmin.org/ front page had the news, too. -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Troels Arvin > Sent: 01 December 2004 10:45 > To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote: > > > GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the > "--addsign" rpm > > parameter. > > By the way: It would be nice if Dave's signature were used, > as is the case for the source tar-balls. Dave: Do you have > RPM on your system? - Could you add signatures to the RPM files? No, I don't have RPM I'm afraid. Besides, unless I produce them, I'm not signing them anyway - I think that is the responsibility of the individual packager. > By the way: A freshmeat update has been submitted, so a > freshmeat announcement is on its way. Thanks. > Now, it would be nice > if the http://www.pgadmin.org/ front page had the news, too. Working on it... :-) /D
----Message d'origine---- >A: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org >De: Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk> >Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded >Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:44:31 +0100 > >On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote: > >> GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm >> parameter. > >By the way: It would be nice if Dave's signature were used, as is the case >for the source tar-balls. Dave: Do you have RPM on your system? - Could >you add signatures to the RPM files? mmmh, I'm not sure it's a good solution... How could Dave be sure that the RPMs he is signing are really the right ones (<thinking while writing>A signed mail fromDevrim with MD5s in it would suffice for Dave</thinking while writing>). IMHO it's the packager responsibility to signits own work and not the project coordinator responsibility. Devrim, maybe you should take time to sign major releases and let snapshots live unsigned. Regards, Raphaël
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:56:05 +0000, Dave Page wrote: > Besides, unless I produce them, I'm not signing them anyway OK. That's a fair policy. >> Now, it would be nice >> if the http://www.pgadmin.org/ front page had the news, too. > > Working on it... Oh, yes. I can see that. Nice. -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Troels Arvin wrote:
>> It's very hard for me -- the servers and users that I build RPMs and use
>> gpg are different...
>
> GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the "--addsign" rpm
> parameter.
Ok, seems what I've missed before. Using the right conf, I think it's ok.
Uploaded the new RPM for FC3 and SRPM to developer site. Could you please
take a look at them?
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBrbBgtl86P3SPfQ4RAuBQAJ964u7qE5V5eQq4q8yvXW8KeH7tTACglFeC
z1sflvqiOOWl8O2oCls7ysA=
=C1LA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:51:59 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > Uploaded the new RPM for FC3 and SRPM to developer site. Could you please > take a look at them? Both the src and i686 RPMs look fine, including the signatures: As root, I imported your public key into the RPM database: rpm --import devrimgunduz.pgp.pub Then, I checked the RPM signatures: rpm --checksig *.rpm I suggest that public GPG keys related to pgadmin be gathered on a single URL on the pgadmin3 website, so that both Dave's and Devrim's public keys can easily be imported in one's GPG and RPM keyrings. I have a trusted Fedora Core 1 host on which I could build an FC1 RPM. I noone else is already doing that, I'll give it a shot within a day or two. -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
Dave Page wrote: > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in > src, slack and win formats. Ah, there it is our new baby, thanks to all contributors, packagers, translators, friends! > Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new > code committed :-) Config editor coming RSN... Regards, Andreas
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 01 December 2004 12:27 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded > > Dave Page wrote: > > I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to > http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ > > in src, slack and win formats. > > Ah, there it is our new baby, thanks to all contributors, > packagers, translators, friends! Yes, indeed :-) Cigars all round! /D
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:19:21 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote (subject: "Re: 1.2.0 Gold uploaded"): > I have a trusted Fedora Core 1 host on which I could build an FC1 RPM. I > noone else is already doing that, I'll give it a shot within a day or two. I succeded in building an RPM on Fedora Core 1: http://troels.arvin.dk/pgadmin/ By the way: It installs without warnings on Fedora Core 2 and 3, as well. And it also runs fine on such hosts, it seems. The FC3-targeted RPM currently on the ftp mirrors will not run on older Fedora Core releases. A thought: If a single RPM will really work for all by being built on a FC1 host, why not just distribute such an RPM? I've rewritten parts of the spec-file. Most importantly, I now include the source of wxGTK and the latest PostgreSQL 8 beta in the build process, to minimize dependencies on the build host. As previously, the pgadmin3 binary is statically linked to wxGTK and PostgreSQL's libraries. -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Troels Arvin wrote: > I succeded in building an RPM on Fedora Core 1: Good news. > http://troels.arvin.dk/pgadmin/ > By the way: It installs without warnings on Fedora Core 2 and 3, as well. > And it also runs fine on such hosts, it seems. > > The FC3-targeted RPM currently on the ftp mirrors will not run on older > Fedora Core releases. > A thought: If a single RPM will really work for all by being built on a > FC1 host, why not just distribute such an RPM? I'm not against that, but we know that Fedora users upgrade their desktops quickly, so I believe we don't have that much FC1 users around. So FC3 targeted RPM will work well for many users. > I've rewritten parts of the spec-file. Most importantly, I now include > the source of wxGTK and the latest PostgreSQL 8 beta in the build process, > to minimize dependencies on the build host. As previously, the pgadmin3 > binary is statically linked to wxGTK and PostgreSQL's libraries. Could you please send me the SRPM so that we can track the changes in spec file and apply it to my RPMS, if possible? Regards, - -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBr1Y9tl86P3SPfQ4RAjvPAJ9MifIRMhF/wsgKDLeNCBW7gDxE5wCcDpG1 zAT1g06k9EsvJRN3uIhYeNI= =KDyp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 19:51:55 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > Could you please send me the SRPM so that we can track the changes in spec > file and apply it to my RPMS, if possible? It's at http://troels.arvin.dk/pgadmin/ -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
Hi, On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Troels Arvin wrote: >> Could you please send me the SRPM so that we can track the changes in spec >> file and apply it to my RPMS, if possible? > > It's at http://troels.arvin.dk/pgadmin/ Cool. We can use this spec from now on... -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org