Thread: RC2 needed
Seems we should roll a second RC quite soon, because RC1 has the comboboxes messed up in gtk (thanks to me), and pgsql just changed the system schema in a way that stops pgsql from working. Hopefully, we don't have more of those last minute schema changes... Regards, Andreas
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Andreas Pflug > Sent: 10 November 2004 18:42 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] RC2 needed > > Seems we should roll a second RC quite soon, because RC1 has > the comboboxes messed up in gtk (thanks to me), and pgsql > just changed the system schema in a way that stops pgsql from > working. Hopefully, we don't have more of those last minute > schema changes... OK, anything else to go in? I can *possibly* do one tomorrow, following that, I'm taking 2 weeks off work having now finished at Uni (yay!) so will probably be working on pgAdmin etc. in the evenings only (which won't stop me doing an RC. I'd like to filter the translations this time around as well. Did we decide on a criteria for inclusion yet? Regards, Dave
Dave Page wrote: > > > > > OK, anything else to go in? Nothing I'm aware of. Any other system schema change I didn't notice? > I can *possibly* do one tomorrow, following > that, I'm taking 2 weeks off work having now finished at Uni (yay!) so > will probably be working on pgAdmin etc. in the evenings only (which > won't stop me doing an RC. > > I'd like to filter the translations this time around as well. Did we > decide on a criteria for inclusion yet? No. How is this handled in pgsql? Should we drop 10 languages we previously supported? Regards, Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Andreas Pflug wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to filter the translations this time around as well. Did we
>> decide on a criteria for inclusion yet?
>
> No. How is this handled in pgsql? Should we drop 10 languages we previously
> supported?
%99 might be a sub-limit for translations :-D (Turkish is 99% heh heh heh)
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBlJCvtl86P3SPfQ4RAsbyAKDYPe5E0lCL3uFqfxk7+Dxtk+6UKwCgkbg5
Sa30ZYzMGOAogH0AJZPQkzI=
=B7ym
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Andreas Pflug wrote: > >>> >>> I'd like to filter the translations this time around as well. Did we >>> decide on a criteria for inclusion yet? >> >> >> No. How is this handled in pgsql? Should we drop 10 languages we >> previously supported? > > > %99 might be a sub-limit for translations :-D (Turkish is 99% heh heh heh) We're risking to lose more languages, when we release 1.4 shortly after 1.2. I'd still ship the previously shipped languages, but have them marked unmaintained, and remove all 0% translations from the "at work" section. Regards, Andreas
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 12 November 2004 10:09 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC2 needed > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > > > > OK, anything else to go in? > > Nothing I'm aware of. Any other system schema change I didn't notice? Don't think so. I didn't notice that one :-( (which I think is odd considering the normal amount of chatter regarding initdb's during beta). Still, I have been somewhat distracted these last couple of weeks. > > I can *possibly* do one tomorrow, following that, I'm > taking 2 weeks > > off work having now finished at Uni (yay!) so will probably > be working > > on pgAdmin etc. in the evenings only (which won't stop me > doing an RC. > > > > I'd like to filter the translations this time around as > well. Did we > > decide on a criteria for inclusion yet? > > No. How is this handled in pgsql? Should we drop 10 languages > we previously supported? Don't know, and perhaps, yes. It has been noted to me a couple of times in the past that partial translations just look messy and unprofessional, so maybe we drop any below, say, 90%, and add a note to the helpfile telling users how they can get the partials if they want, and how they can help improve them? I have already moved the 'clearly unmaintained' ones to the pending section on the website, and merged the vacant section with it as you may have noticed. I think I have also fixed the caching problem btw - translation updates should now be shown within 15 minutes on www and developer. Anyway, the new organisation leaves only one translation in the published table at below 90% (Hungarian). Interestingly, one unmaintained one (Chinese Traditional) is actually at 91%... Did Chih-Hsin Lee 'resign'? Regards, Dave
Dave Page wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] >>Sent: 12 November 2004 10:09 >>To: Dave Page >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC2 needed >> >>Dave Page wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>OK, anything else to go in? >> >>Nothing I'm aware of. Any other system schema change I didn't notice? > > > Don't think so. I didn't notice that one :-( (which I think is odd > considering the normal amount of chatter regarding initdb's during > beta). Still, I have been somewhat distracted these last couple of > weeks. > > >>>I can *possibly* do one tomorrow, following that, I'm >> >>taking 2 weeks >> >>>off work having now finished at Uni (yay!) so will probably >> >>be working >> >>>on pgAdmin etc. in the evenings only (which won't stop me >> >>doing an RC. >> >>>I'd like to filter the translations this time around as >> >>well. Did we >> >>>decide on a criteria for inclusion yet? >> >>No. How is this handled in pgsql? Should we drop 10 languages >>we previously supported? > > > Don't know, and perhaps, yes. It has been noted to me a couple of times > in the past that partial translations just look messy and > unprofessional, so maybe we drop any below, say, 90%, and add a note to > the helpfile telling users how they can get the partials if they want, > and how they can help improve them? > > I have already moved the 'clearly unmaintained' ones to the pending > section on the website, and merged the vacant section with it as you may > have noticed. I think I have also fixed the caching problem btw - > translation updates should now be shown within 15 minutes on www and > developer. Anyway, the new organisation leaves only one translation in > the published table at below 90% (Hungarian). Interestingly, one > unmaintained one (Chinese Traditional) is actually at 91%... Did > Chih-Hsin Lee 'resign'? The previous version did reflect the feedback status on resigned translators. <lookup ver='prev'>Arabic, Swedish and Chinese (trad) gave feedback that they couldn't proceed</lookup> I don't see a reason to keep those 0 % translations after one year of zero result. Regards, Andreas