Thread: Server autodetect
Dave, I did some coding on service handling. Autodetect code now recognizes if a serviceID is already known, and skips it. I don't see a reason to continue the autodetect specific stuff then. What do you mean? Are you working on a dlgServer or did I misunderstand you? We'll need to make the serviceID editable. I haven't checked if it works remotely too (server\service). Regards, Andreas
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas.Pflug@web.de [mailto:Andreas.Pflug@web.de] > Sent: 05 August 2004 22:42 > To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Server autodetect > > Dave, > > I did some coding on service handling. Autodetect code now > recognizes if a serviceID is already known, and skips it. I > don't see a reason to continue the autodetect specific stuff > then. Eh? Do you mean you've made the autodetected servers behave the same as the normal ones once they've been detected (and are presumably storing the serviceID for all now)? There was a reason why I didn't do that in the first place, but I can't for the life of me think what it was now. Oh, and I didn't see a commit message about it... > What do you mean? Me? I don't mean anything. What about you? :-) > Are you working on a dlgServer or did I misunderstand you? > We'll need to make the serviceID editable. I haven't checked > if it works remotely too (server\service). No I'm not. Sorry, but I'm bang in the middle of my dissertation right now, and with a baby in the house as well I barely have time to eat :-(. On the plus side I finish my DS in November (and the entire course for that matter) so will have a lot more time then :-). I'm in a sort of 'chip in with 5 minutes work where possible' mode at the moment. Regards, Dave.
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dave Page > Sent: 06 August 2004 08:17 > To: Andreas.Pflug@web.de; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server autodetect > > > > Oh, and I didn't see a commit message about it... Scratch that - found it. /D
Dave Page wrote: > > Eh? Do you mean you've made the autodetected servers behave the same as > the normal ones once they've been detected (and are presumably storing > the serviceID for all now)? When the special registry handling of autodetect servers is removed, yes. serviceID is stored for all, might be "". local servers are detected and skipped when autodetecting. There was a reason why I didn't do that in > the first place, but I can't for the life of me think what it was now. I remember that. I often wonder myself what I did when code is reviewed. :-) > Oh, and I didn't see a commit message about it... Need glasses ? ;-) >>What do you mean? > Me? I don't mean anything. What about you? :-) So I'll drop that autodetect keys. >>Are you working on a dlgServer or did I misunderstand you? >>We'll need to make the serviceID editable. I haven't checked >>if it works remotely too (server\service). > > > No I'm not. Sorry, but I'm bang in the middle of my dissertation right > now, and with a baby in the house as well I barely have time to eat :-(. Well, I didn't say you should eat or even sleep, I was just asking for coding :-) > On the plus side I finish my DS in November (and the entire course for > that matter) so will have a lot more time then :-). I'm in a sort of > 'chip in with 5 minutes work where possible' mode at the moment. I see, go on. Regards, Andreas