Le ven 09/01/2004 à 00:34, Raphaël Enrici a écrit :
> Hi Andreas,
>
> concerning this problem we exchanged some mail with Aurélien and
> couldn't find any reason why this window is not displayed correctly on
Note that my (girl)-friend has the same system, only more recently setup
and it does not exhibit the problem. I would bet it is an extremely rare
and obnoxious condition that causes it. I dare suggest it is not really
worth spending time tracking it (gee, recently I've had problems with
slow Mozilla *shutdowns*).
> its system. Any Idea of where we could start from ? I tried to get a
> system configured as near as I could from his own one, but I still can't
> reproduce the bug.
I strongly suspect it comes from src/unix/mimetype.cpp code from wxWin.
There's code there that tries to guess what are the mime types
definitions from *various* source in the system, and guess what, on a
heavily loaded debian sid, there can be many. Strangely, the process of
parsing/analyzing/frobnicating those files takes maybe a longer time
that "could" be...
>
> Another thing which Aurélien told me and which is reproducable in some
> cases
albeit version 1.0.2 does not shows this on win2k - I didn't test the
snapshot version in that case
> is a high CPU consumption when opening the preferences/options for
> the first time (it takes approximatively 90% cpu for about 1 or 2
> seconds on my athlon XP2000+ and about 5 seconds 100%CPU on its athlon
> 700)... As far as I could test, it seems to be linked with the packages
> installed : on a minimal system I can't observe this.
minimal, like win2k ?-)
I suspect it is related to the wxWin routines mentioned above, too, as
the strace shows (storm of stat64(), brk(), and fork() )
I hope this helps.
>
> Any Idea ? How does it looks like on other distros ?
>
> Regards,
> Raphaël
>
> Aurélien Campéas wrote:
>
> >Want a snapshot ? Have it :)
> >
> >Le mar 16/12/2003 à 20:04, Andreas Pflug a écrit :
> >
> >
> >>Aurélien Campéas wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Seems like 1.1 has the same problems.
> >>>Also, the log level is not selectable from the GUI (there's nothing to
> >>>click on, just a gray empty panel).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>?!?!?
> >>Nothing to be seen from file/options?
> >>Never heard something like that.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >A kind of Batman of contemporary letters. -- Philip Larkin on Anthony
> >Burgess
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >
> >
There is a 20% chance of tomorrow.
