Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 June 2019

• 02:38   Re: Sv: JIT in PostgreSQL 12 ? Justin Pryzby
• 16:17   Re: Shortest offline window on database migration Haroldo Kerry

4 June 2019

• 17:34   Strange query behaviour between 9.4 and 12beta1 Vasilis Ventirozos
• 23:18   Re: Shortest offline window on database migration Stephen Frost

5 June 2019

• 02:01   Re: Strange query behaviour between 9.4 and 12beta1 Tomas Vondra

11 June 2019

• 23:27   Re: UUID v1 optimizations... Ancoron Luciferis

14 June 2019

• 06:30   Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched) Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched) Fabio Pardi
• 16:46   wal_log_hints benchmarks Fabio Pardi
• 17:39   Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched) Bruce Momjian
• 17:44   Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched) Bruce Momjian
• 19:15   Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched) Stephen Frost
• 19:16   Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched) Stephen Frost

17 June 2019

• 05:01   Re: wal_log_hints benchmarks Michael Paquier
• 10:53   Re: wal_log_hints benchmarks Fabio Pardi

18 June 2019

• 16:11   Incorrect index used in few cases.. AminPG Jaffer
• 16:35   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. AminPG Jaffer

19 June 2019

• 00:07   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. Tom Lane
• 00:49   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. Peter Geoghegan
• 01:13   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. Andres Freund
• 01:23   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. Tom Lane

20 June 2019

• 18:12   EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Chris Wilson
• 18:56   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Simon Riggs
• 19:00   RE: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Chris Wilson
• 19:18   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Simon Riggs
• 19:30   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Justin Pryzby
• 19:51   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Simon Riggs
• 21:09   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Michael Lewis
• 21:13   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Justin Pryzby
• 21:16   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Michael Lewis

21 June 2019

• 12:17   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Simon Riggs
• 12:20   RE: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Chris Wilson
• 12:43   RE: EXPLAIN ANALYZE of BRIN bitmap index scan with disjunction Chris Wilson
• 15:22   Using indexes in RLS policies (sub)queries Grégory EL MAJJOUTI

23 June 2019

• 17:21   materialized view refresh of a foreign table Rick Otten
• 17:24   monitoring tuple_count vs dead_tuple_count Mariel Cherkassky
• 18:07   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. AminPG Jaffer

24 June 2019

• 20:31   scans on table fail to be excluded by partition bounds Justin Pryzby

25 June 2019

• 13:48   RE: scans on table fail to be excluded by partition bounds Steven Winfield
• 14:03   Re: materialized view refresh of a foreign table Rick Otten
• 18:49   Perplexing, regular decline in performance Hugh Ranalli
• 18:55   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Benjamin Scherrey
• 19:01   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Justin Pryzby
• 19:06   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Benjamin Scherrey
• 19:23   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Justin Pryzby

26 June 2019

• 10:13   Max_connections limit Daulat Ram
• 12:05   Re: Max_connections limit Laurenz Albe
• 12:15   Re: Max_connections limit Hervé Schweitzer (HER)
• 15:38   Re: Max_connections limit Rick Otten
• 17:24   Re: Incorrect index used in few cases.. AminPG Jaffer
• 17:29   RE: Max_connections limit Igor Neyman
• 21:03   Re: scans on table fail to be excluded by partition bounds Justin Pryzby
• 21:06   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Hugh Ranalli
• 21:52   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Peter Geoghegan
• 22:00   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Hugh Ranalli
• 22:02   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Hugh Ranalli
• 22:05   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Peter Geoghegan
• 22:07   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Alvaro Herrera
• 22:18   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Tom Lane

27 June 2019

• 01:09   Re: scans on table fail to be excluded by partition bounds David Rowley
• 03:24   Re: Perplexing, regular decline in performance Justin Pryzby