Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

20 April 2010

• 12:38   Dbt2 with postgres issues on CentOS-5.3‏  MUHAMMAD ASIF
• 14:49   [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Kevin Grittner
• 15:12   stats collector suddenly causing lots of IO Chris
• 15:12   Re: significant slow down with various LIMIT norn
• 15:12   Re: Planner not using column limit specified for one column for another column equal to first Hannu Krosing
• 15:12   HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Dave Crooke
• 16:23   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Dave Crooke
• 16:28   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Kris Jurka
• 16:39   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Kevin Grittner
• 17:39   Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 17:42   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Joshua D. Drake
• 17:44   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Robert Haas
• 18:04   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 18:12   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Nikolas Everett
• 18:15   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Robert Haas
• 18:16   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Scott Marlowe
• 18:17   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Kevin Grittner
• 18:20   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Kris Jurka
• 18:20   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Scott Marlowe
• 18:20   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 18:24   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Scott Marlowe
• 18:28   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 18:30   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Scott Marlowe
• 18:32   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 18:46   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 18:47   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 19:05   performance change from 8.3.1 to later releases Roger Ging
• 19:22   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Scott Marlowe
• 19:24   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Scott Marlowe
• 19:29   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Dave Crooke
• 19:34   Re: performance change from 8.3.1 to later releases Scott Marlowe
• 19:57   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Nikolas Everett
• 20:22   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Kevin Grittner
• 20:27   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? Greg Smith
• 20:39   Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? David Kerr
• 20:40   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Dave Crooke
• 21:06   Re: [JDBC] SOLVED ... Re: Getting rid of a cursor from JDBC .... Re: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set Kris Jurka
• 21:57   Re: significant slow down with various LIMIT Kevin Grittner