Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Date
Msg-id z2hdcc563d11004201130u8b1a6fmeb76b65111adf1ee@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?  (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>)
Responses Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> wrote:
>
> I'm logging via syslog, I've had trouble with that before. when i moved to syslog-ng
> on my dev environments that mostly resoved the probelm for me. but these machines
> still have vanilla syslog.

Yea, I almost always log directly via stdout on production machines
because of that.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Kerr
Date:
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Next
From: David Kerr
Date:
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?