Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Kerr
Subject Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Date
Msg-id 20100420183215.GC53489@mr-paradox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:30:14PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
- On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> wrote:
- >
- > I'm logging via syslog, I've had trouble with that before. when i moved to syslog-ng
- > on my dev environments that mostly resoved the probelm for me. but these machines
- > still have vanilla syslog.
-
- Yea, I almost always log directly via stdout on production machines
- because of that.
-

Ah well good to know i'm not the only one =)

I'll get the query info. I've got a twin system that I can use and abuse.

Dave

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Next
From: David Kerr
Date:
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?