Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

22 July 2009

• 03:47   Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? Kelvin Quee
• 04:45   Atomic access to large arrays Victor de Buen (Bayes)
• 05:11   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Oleg Bartunov
• 05:42   Re: Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? Scott Marlowe
• 07:52   Re: Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? Kelvin Quee
• 08:12   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Victor de Buen
• 11:54   Re: Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? Scott Marlowe
• 13:54   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Victor de Buen
• 16:31   Re: Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? Greg Sabino Mullane
• 16:39   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Victor de Buen (Bayes)
• 17:17   Re: Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? Chris Browne
• 18:39   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Merlin Moncure
• 19:02   Re: Odd performance / query plan with bitmasked field as opposed to equality Robert Haas
• 19:02   Re: regression ? 8.4 do not apply One-Time Filter to subquery Robert Haas
• 19:08   Re: Atomic access to large arrays Victor de Buen
• 19:47   Re: Master/Slave, DB separation or just spend $$$? David Rees