Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

8 August 2006

• 00:24   Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642 Steve Poe
• 01:11   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Luke Lonergan
• 01:46   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Steve Poe
• 02:19   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Joshua D. Drake
• 02:28   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Steve Poe
• 04:13   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Steve Poe
• 06:33   Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough Alex Turner
• 06:40   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Alex Turner
• 07:39   vacuuming Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
• 10:40   shared_buffer optimization Ruben Rubio
• 12:05   Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough Stephen Frost
• 12:14   Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough Stephen Frost
• 12:20   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642 Jeff Trout
• 12:38   Re: shared_buffer optimization Christopher Browne
• 13:57   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Steve Poe
• 14:36   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Luke Lonergan
• 15:01   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Steve Poe
• 16:23   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Luke Lonergan
• 16:57   Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and Steve Poe
• 17:49   Optimizing queries Patrice Beliveau
• 18:40   Re: Optimizing queries Scott Marlowe
• 20:15   Re: Optimizing queries Patrice Beliveau
• 20:42   Re: Optimizing queries Tom Lane
• 21:04   most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Kenji Morishige
• 21:49   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Joshua D. Drake
• 21:59   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Thomas F. O'Connell
• 22:08   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Kenji Morishige
• 22:08   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Scott Marlowe
• 22:15   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Kenji Morishige
• 22:18   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Steve Atkins
• 22:28   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Joshua D. Drake
• 22:53   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Thomas F. O'Connell
• 23:24   Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Joshua D. Drake