Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> I am considering a setup such as this:
>>> - At least dual cpu (possibly with 2 cores each)
>>> - 4GB of RAM
>>> - 2 disk RAID 1 array for root disk
>>> - 4 disk RAID 1+0 array for PGDATA
>>> - 2 disk RAID 1 array for pg_xlog
>>> Does anyone know a vendor that might be able provide such setup?
>
> Wouldn't it be preferable to put WAL on a multi-disk RAID 10 if you had
> the opportunity? This gives you the redundancy of RAID 1 but approaches
> the performance of RAID 0, especially as you add disks to the array. In
> benchmarking, I've seen consistent success with this approach.
WALL is written in order so RAID 1 is usually fine. We also don't need
journaling for WAL so the speed is even faster.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> Thomas F. O'Connell
> Sitening, LLC
>
> http://www.sitening.com/
> 3004B Poston Avenue
> Nashville, TN 37203-1314
> 615-469-5150 x802
> 615-469-5151 (fax)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
