Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 June 2016

• 01:09   Re: Questionabl description in datatype.sgml Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   Re: Hash Indexes Amit Kapila
• 02:17   Re: Hash Indexes Amit Kapila
• 03:16   Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype David Rowley
• 04:42   Documentation fixes for pg_visibility Michael Paquier
• 04:46   Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility Michael Paquier
• 04:53   Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility Michael Paquier
• 06:43   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 06:50   Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails Michael Paquier
• 06:51   Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails Michael Paquier
• 07:24   Comment and function argument names are mismatched in bugmgr.c. Masahiko Sawada
• 07:44   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). amul sul
• 07:55   PQconnectdbParams vs PQconninfoParse Craig Ringer
• 09:34   Feature suggestions: "dead letter"-savepoint. Terje Elde
• 09:50   Re: Feature suggestions: "dead letter"-savepoint. Marko Tiikkaja
• 10:22   Re: Requesting external_pid_file with postgres -C when not initialized lead to coredump alain radix
• 10:48   Re: Feature suggestions: "dead letter"-savepoint. Terje Elde
• 12:32   Re: Feature suggestions: "dead letter"-savepoint. Craig Ringer
• 12:52   Extract Jsonb key and values hari.prasath
• 13:26   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Bruce Momjian
• 13:30   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Bruce Momjian
• 13:59   Re: PQconnectdbParams vs PQconninfoParse Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: how is the WAL receiver process stopped and restarted when the network connection is broken and then restored? Rui Hai Jiang
• 14:57   Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype Tom Lane
• 16:16   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Alex Ignatov
• 16:26   Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). David G. Johnston
• 16:50   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Alex Ignatov
• 17:12   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Robert Haas
• 17:12   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). David G. Johnston
• 17:16   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Robert Haas
• 17:20   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Robert Haas
• 17:25   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: Hash Indexes Robert Haas
• 17:29   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Alvaro Herrera
• 17:31   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Robert Haas
• 17:39   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Alvaro Herrera
• 17:41   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Tom Lane
• 17:43   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Robert Haas
• 17:46   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). David G. Johnston
• 17:50   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Simon Riggs
• 17:55   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Robert Haas
• 18:01   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Alvaro Herrera
• 18:02   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Tom Lane
• 18:53   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Jim Nasby
• 18:56   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). David G. Johnston
• 19:15   Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres Flavius Anton
• 20:51   Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres Greg Stark
• 21:17   initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Umair Shahid
• 21:54   Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres Flavius Anton
• 22:27   Re: Questionabl description in datatype.sgml Tatsuo Ishii
• 22:42   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 23:00   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Alvaro Herrera
• 23:00   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps David Rowley
• 23:03   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 23:14   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps David Rowley
• 23:35   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Tom Lane