initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Umair Shahid
Subject initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date
Msg-id CAM184AcjqKYZSdQqBHDrnENXHhW=mXbUC46QYPJ=nAh0gUHCGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@2ndquadrant.com>, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Packagers <pgsql-packagers@postgresql.org>


Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> That makes more sense as the joinrel stuff *has* been changed between the
> two betas. I'm sure someone who's touched that code (Tom?) can comment on
> that part..

It still makes little sense to me, as the previous reports say that the
problem happened during bootstrap, and the planner does not run
during bootstrap.

Could we get a look at debug_query_string in the coredump, to possibly
narrow down where the crash is really happening?

Moving thread to -hackers ... 

debug_query_string is


"INSERT INTO pg_description  SELECT t.objoid, c.oid, t.objsubid, t.description   FROM tmp_pg_description t, pg_class c     WHERE c.relname = t.classname;"

Happening in "setup_description"
 

> It's still strange that it doesn't affect woodlouse.

Or any of the other Windows critters...

                        regards, tom lane



--
Umair Shahid
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres
Next
From: Flavius Anton
Date:
Subject: Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres