Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

14 November 2015

• 00:00   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Tom Lane
• 00:22   Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c David G. Johnston
• 00:34   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Dean Rasheed
• 00:37   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Dean Rasheed
• 01:09   Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend Robert Haas
• 01:51   check for interrupts in set_rtable_names Jeff Janes
• 02:10   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Tom Lane
• 02:13   Re: check for interrupts in set_rtable_names Tom Lane
• 02:37   Re: check for interrupts in set_rtable_names Jeff Janes
• 03:16   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Dean Rasheed
• 03:19   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Dean Rasheed
• 03:42   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Tom Lane
• 06:13   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Amit Kapila
• 10:50   Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive Amit Kapila
• 11:05   Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Amit Langote
• 15:29   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Dean Rasheed
• 17:06   Re: pg_stat_statements query jumbling question Michael Paquier
• 17:41   Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API Craig Ringer
• 17:45   Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive Craig Ringer
• 19:13   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Tom Lane
• 19:35   Re: pg_stat_statements query jumbling question Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Dean Rasheed
• 23:04   Re: Python 3 compatibility fun Peter Eisentraut
• 23:05   Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() Tom Lane