On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2015/10/29 23:22, Syed, Rahila wrote:
> How about the following instead -
>
> + snprintf(progress_message[0], PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH, "%s",
> + generate_relation_name(onerel));
That was a useless suggestion, sorry. It still could be rewritten as -
+ snprintf(progress_message[0], PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH, "%s.%s",
+ get_namespace_name(RelationGetNamespace(rel)),
+ relname);
Thanks,
Amit