Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

20 February 2014

• 00:15   Re: Fwd: patch: make_timestamp function Tom Lane
• 00:26   pg_standby: Question about truncation of trigger file in fast failover Neil Thombre
• 00:40   Re: GiST support for inet datatypes Emre Hasegeli
• 00:43   Re: pg_standby: Question about truncation of trigger file in fast failover Heikki Linnakangas
• 02:37   Re: GiST support for inet datatypes Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? Andres Freund
• 03:34   Priority table or Cache table Haribabu Kommi
• 03:35   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Tom Lane
• 03:38   Re: Priority table or Cache table Tom Lane
• 03:43   Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? Michael Paquier
• 03:49   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled. Michael Paquier
• 03:55   Re: Priority table or Cache table Haribabu Kommi
• 04:06   Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? Michael Paquier
• 04:22   Re: [BUGS] BUG #9210: PostgreSQL string store bug? not enforce check with correct characterSET/encoding Tom Lane
• 04:27   Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? Michael Paquier
• 04:32   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Tom Lane
• 04:49   Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Florian Pflug
• 04:58   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Alvaro Herrera
• 05:05   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:09   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Tom Lane
• 05:15   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled. Peter Geoghegan
• 06:26   Re: Priority table or Cache table Amit Kapila
• 07:39   Re: BUG #9210: PostgreSQL string store bug? not enforce check with correct characterSET/encoding Noah Misch
• 07:54   Re: Priority table or Cache table Haribabu Kommi
• 09:47   Re: inherit support for foreign tables Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 10:05   Re: inherit support for foreign tables Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 10:16   Selecting large tables gets killed Ashutosh Bapat
• 10:37   Re: PoC: Partial sort Alexander Korotkov
• 11:18   Re: Fwd: patch: make_timestamp function Pavel Stehule
• 11:32   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Craig Ringer
• 11:43   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed amul sul
• 11:44   Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:45   Re: [review] PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start if data directory given is relative path Rajeev rastogi
• 11:49   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed amul sul
• 12:00   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled. Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:02   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Ashutosh Bapat
• 12:04   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Ian Lawrence Barwick
• 12:06   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Pavan Deolasee
• 12:07   Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication Christian Kruse
• 12:19   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Ashutosh Bapat
• 12:48   Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:56   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Bernd Helmle
• 13:07   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Ashutosh Bapat
• 13:18   Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:56   Re: inherit support for foreign tables Etsuro Fujita
• 14:06   Re: Priority table or Cache table Ashutosh Bapat
• 14:55   Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory MauMau
• 14:58   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Marti Raudsepp
• 16:26   Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? Greg Stark
• 16:31   Re: GiST support for inet datatypes Emre Hasegeli
• 16:45   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Simon Riggs
• 17:30   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Greg Stark
• 17:44   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Simon Riggs
• 17:52   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Tom Lane
• 18:11   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Greg Stark
• 18:16   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Robert Haas
• 18:19   Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?) Kohei KaiGai
• 18:22   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Robert Haas
• 18:30   Re: Selecting large tables gets killed Bernd Helmle
• 19:01   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Hannu Krosing
• 20:07   Re: WAL Rate Limiting Alvaro Herrera
• 20:54   Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? Andres Freund