Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 December 2011

• 00:13   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Tom Lane
• 00:30   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Peter Geoghegan
• 00:31   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Robert Haas
• 01:10   Re: Command Triggers Tom Lane
• 01:15   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Robert Haas
• 01:17   Re: Why so few built-in range types? Robert Haas
• 01:46   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: Why so few built-in range types? Tom Lane
• 02:22   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Robert Haas
• 02:48   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Tom Lane
• 03:00   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Robert Haas
• 04:16   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Tom Lane
• 04:30   Re: Accounting for toast in query planner. (gin/gist indexes). Tom Lane
• 07:43   Re: Why so few built-in range types? Peter Eisentraut
• 07:59   Re: bug of recovery? Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:14   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Peter Eisentraut
• 09:52   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Albe Laurenz
• 10:49   Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor) Alexander Korotkov
• 10:52   Re: Prep object creation hooks, and related sepgsql updates Kohei KaiGai
• 12:01   Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:33   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Peter Geoghegan
• 12:45   Re: Why so few built-in range types? Stephen Frost
• 12:56   Re: Why so few built-in range types? Robert Haas
• 12:58   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Robert Haas
• 13:23   Re: Why so few built-in range types? karavelov@mail.bg
• 14:05   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Tom Lane
• 14:57   pg_upgrade and regclass Bruce Momjian
• 15:06   Re: Java LISTEN/NOTIFY client library work-around Joel Jacobson
• 15:12   Re: patch for type privileges Yeb Havinga
• 15:16   Re: Java LISTEN/NOTIFY client library work-around Merlin Moncure
• 15:55   Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 18:35   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Bruce Momjian
• 19:05   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Pavel Stehule
• 19:22   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Robert Haas
• 19:33   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 19:42   Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation Bruce Momjian
• 19:47   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 19:49   Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Josh Berkus
• 19:52   Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Heikki Linnakangas
• 20:02   Re: Command Triggers Andres Freund
• 20:11   Re: FlexLocks Kevin Grittner
• 20:22   Re: PL/Python SQL error code pass-through Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:10   Re: Patch - Debug builds without optimization Bruce Momjian
• 21:10   Re: Command Triggers Andres Freund
• 21:20   clog buffers (and FlexLocks) Robert Haas
• 21:25   Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:05   Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Tom Lane
• 22:05   Re: Command Triggers Dimitri Fontaine
• 22:26   Re: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how to solve it? Daniel Farina
• 23:03   Re: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how to solve it? Robert Haas
• 23:10   Re: Command Triggers Alvaro Herrera
• 23:17   Re: Command Triggers Robert Haas
• 23:26   Re: Command Triggers Andres Freund