Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

15 August 2011

• 00:53   Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame Greg Smith
• 01:49   synchronized snapshots Joachim Wieland
• 03:28   Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 07:27   Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662 daveg
• 07:40   Re: synchronized snapshots Simon Riggs
• 07:47   Re: synchronized snapshots Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:51   Re: synchronized snapshots Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:07   Re: synchronized snapshots Andres Freund
• 08:48   Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby Jun Ishiduka
• 08:51   Re: synchronized snapshots PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 10:42   Re: synchronized snapshots Florian Weimer
• 11:03   pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage Magnus Hagander
• 11:22   walprotocol.h vs frontends Magnus Hagander
• 11:29   Re: synchronized snapshots Joachim Wieland
• 11:51   Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage Robert Haas
• 11:52   Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby Robert Haas
• 11:54   Re: synchronized snapshots Joachim Wieland
• 12:28   Re: SSI error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 13:38   Re: synchronized snapshots Robert Haas
• 13:42   Re: VACUUM FULL versus TOAST Robert Haas
• 14:01   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Peter Geoghegan
• 14:20   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Tom Lane
• 14:44   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Magnus Hagander
• 14:54   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: synchronized snapshots Kevin Grittner
• 15:55   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Magnus Hagander
• 15:56   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Steve Singer
• 16:03   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:12   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Magnus Hagander
• 16:33   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Peter Geoghegan
• 16:41   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Magnus Hagander
• 17:06   Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame Kevin Grittner
• 17:09   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Steve Singer
• 17:27   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Tom Lane
• 17:39   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Peter Geoghegan
• 19:20   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Simon Riggs
• 19:49   Should we have an optional limit on the recursion depth of recursive CTEs? Peter Geoghegan
• 20:07   Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue Jim Nasby
• 20:31   Re: Should we have an optional limit on the recursion depth of recursive CTEs? Tom Lane
• 20:54   [v9.2] DROP statement reworks Kohei KaiGai
• 21:32   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Magnus Hagander
• 21:50   Re: Should we have an optional limit on the recursion depth of recursive CTEs? Greg Stark
• 21:50   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Dimitri Fontaine
• 21:53   Re: index-only scans Jim Nasby
• 22:06   Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends Simon Riggs
• 22:09   Re: synchronized snapshots Jim Nasby
• 22:22   Re: mosbench revisited Greg Stark
• 22:43   Re: Should we have an optional limit on the recursion depth of recursive CTEs? Peter Geoghegan
• 22:46   Re: synchronized snapshots Joachim Wieland
• 23:26   Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame Jim Nasby
• 23:37   Re: index-only scans Greg Smith