Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

14 October 2008

• 00:48   Re: Window Functions patch v06 Hitoshi Harada
• 00:59   Re: Window Functions patch v06 Tom Lane
• 02:20   xact_desc Simon Riggs
• 03:06   Re: xact_desc Tom Lane
• 03:36   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 03:37   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches - Patent problems? KaiGai Kohei
• 07:32   Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... CYCLE in vanilla SQL: issues with arrays of rows David Fetter
• 07:37   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:38   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Dave Page
• 07:52   Re: xact_desc Simon Riggs
• 08:34   Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:43   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Charlie Savage
• 08:49   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Dave Page
• 09:23   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Vladimir Sitnikov
• 09:28   Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1120) KaiGai Kohei
• 09:30   Window Functions Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 10:25   log shipping pg_standby Dave Cramer
• 11:52   Re: Proposed patch: make pg_dump --data-only consider FK constraints Philip Warner
• 12:47   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Tom Lane
• 12:52   Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 13:33   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Andrew Dunstan
• 13:49   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Dave Page
• 14:06   Re: log shipping pg_standby Kevin Grittner
• 14:32   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Robert Haas
• 14:41   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Dave Page
• 14:44   Re: Version Number Function? Hannu Krosing
• 14:45   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Tom Lane
• 14:50   Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... CYCLE in vanilla SQL: issues with arrays of rows Merlin Moncure
• 14:59   Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... CYCLE in vanilla SQL: issues with arrays of rows Tom Lane
• 15:19   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Magnus Hagander
• 15:20   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Magnus Hagander
• 15:42   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Dave Page
• 15:48   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Peter Eisentraut
• 15:53   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Peter Eisentraut
• 15:57   Re: autovacuum and reloptions Peter Eisentraut
• 16:06   Re: Version Number Function? David E. Wheeler
• 16:08   Re: patch: Allow the UUID type to accept non-standard formats Peter Eisentraut
• 16:09   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Zdenek Kotala
• 16:12   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Robert Haas
• 16:13   Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED Dave Page
• 16:18   Re: CLUSTER, REINDEX, VACUUM in "read only" transaction? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:19   Re: Window Functions Hannu Krosing
• 16:27   Re: Transactions and temp tables Emmanuel Cecchet
• 16:28   Problem to get the tuple of a table Zhe He
• 16:32   Re: autovacuum and reloptions Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: Transactions and temp tables Alvaro Herrera
• 16:53   Re: Version Number Function? David E. Wheeler
• 17:04   Re: Window Functions Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 17:28   Question about implementing a new operation Zhe He
• 17:48   Deriving Recovery Snapshots Simon Riggs
• 18:41   Constraint partition index usage Michael Glaesemann
• 19:16   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Bruce Momjian
• 19:35   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:36   spoonbill is failing citext test Alvaro Herrera
• 19:41   Re: Version Number Function? Robert Haas
• 19:49   Re: Improving planner variable handling Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test David E. Wheeler
• 19:53   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Heikki Linnakangas
• 20:08   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Tom Lane
• 20:30   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Aidan Van Dyk
• 20:42   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Andrew Dunstan
• 20:53   Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 21:02   Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:11   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test David E. Wheeler
• 21:18   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Andrew Dunstan
• 21:24   Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... CYCLE in vanilla SQL: issues with arrays of rows Merlin Moncure
• 21:25   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 21:27   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: Window Functions Hannu Krosing
• 21:33   Re: Version Number Function? Hannu Krosing
• 21:37   Re: TODO item: adding VERBOSE option to CLUSTER [with patch] Robert Treat
• 21:39   Re: Version Number Function? David E. Wheeler
• 21:44   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Andrew Dunstan
• 21:50   Re: The Axe list Robert Treat
• 21:51   Re: Version Number Function? Hannu Krosing
• 22:02   Re: spoonbill is failing citext test Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 22:16   Re: Version Number Function? David E. Wheeler
• 23:41   Bogus attribute-number range checks in spi.c Tom Lane
• 23:57   Re: Improving planner variable handling Gregory Stark