Re: Version Number Function? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Version Number Function?
Date
Msg-id A13DE4F0-2F13-4ACE-9EDC-56B39AC596BB@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version Number Function?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 14, 2008, at 14:32, Hannu Krosing wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 08:33 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> Well, the C version I borrowed from dumpitils seems to work great.  
>> Any
>> reason I shouldn't stay with that?
>
> SQL is the only "PL" available by default, no need to compile or  
> install
> anything.
>
> It can be written more effectively in almost any other pl, and  
> probably
> in SQL as well ;)

Yes, but I'm putting this into pgTAP, where I already have some C  
functions I'm defining, so another won't hurt any. :-)

Thanks,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: adding VERBOSE option to CLUSTER [with patch]
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: spoonbill is failing citext test