Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

21 January 2005

• 03:57   Re: [GENERAL] Ways to check the status of a long-running transaction Jim C. Nasby
• 04:32   Re: ARC patent Simon Riggs
• 05:51   Re: ARC patent Mark Kirkwood
• 05:54   Re: ARC patent Neil Conway
• 06:01   Re: ARC patent Dann Corbit
• 06:12   Re: Translations at pgfoundry (was Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates) Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 07:21   Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 Kenneth Marshall
• 07:22   Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... Reinoud van Leeuwen
• 07:24   Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) Christopher Browne
• 08:45   It's OSCON Submission time again! Josh Berkus
• 10:52   Re: It's OSCON Submission time again! Oleg Bartunov
• 13:02   Re: Translations at pgfoundry (was Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates) Nicolai Tufar
• 15:28   can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ? Arnold.Zhu
• 15:29   Re: ARC patent Hannu Krosing
• 17:15   Re: can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 17:41   Re: ARC patent Manfred Koizar
• 20:00   Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... Bruce Momjian
• 21:05   Re: ARC patent Bruce Momjian
• 21:46   Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:56   Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... Dawid Kuroczko
• 22:16   8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads ;)) Joshua D. Drake
• 22:56   Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads Marc G. Fournier
• 23:15   Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2 Josh Berkus
• 23:24   Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads Joshua D. Drake
• 23:48   Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads Marc G. Fournier