Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 41F18C50.2090204@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ARC patent  ("John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>)
Responses Re: ARC patent  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>)
Re: ARC patent  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
John Hansen wrote:

>Folks,
>
>Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least unanswered.
>
>Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
>
>
1. We don't have attorneys to do so.
2. The PostgreSQL community is not a legal entity it can license to.
3. It would take weeks if not months to get an answer
4. The patent isn't issed yet.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for if/when the patent is granted.
>
>... John
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: TIP9
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: TIP9