Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

31 March 2004

• 00:06   Re: psql \d option list overloaded Bruce Momjian
• 00:26   Re: pg_dump end comment Philip Warner
• 00:33   Re: pg_dump end comment Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:42   Re: logging statement levels Bruce Momjian
• 05:43   Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* Fabien COELHO
• 06:57   FW: Increasing security in a shared environment ... Simon Riggs
• 10:20   Why is pg_dump using INSERTs instead of COPYs? reina_ga@hotmail.com (Tony Reina)
• 11:35   Re: Why is pg_dump using INSERTs instead of COPYs? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:43   Re: Why is pg_dump using INSERTs instead of COPYs? Tony and Bryn Reina
• 14:24   Re: logging statement levels Andrew Dunstan
• 14:24   Re: Why is pg_dump using INSERTs instead of COPYs? Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: pg_dump end comment scott.marlowe
• 15:17   Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.* Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: logging statement levels Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: Update on PITR Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Update on PITR Devrim GUNDUZ
• 17:57   Re: Update on PITR Stephen Frost
• 18:14   Re: Update on PITR Bruce Momjian
• 18:38   Re: 7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) Tom Lane
• 19:02   7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) Devrim GUNDUZ
• 19:07   LIKE and Locale pgsql@mohawksoft.com
• 19:29   Re: 7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) Marc G. Fournier
• 20:12   Re: Update on PITR Simon Riggs
• 21:10   Re: LIKE and Locale pgsql@mohawksoft.com
• 21:20   Re: LIKE and Locale Stephan Szabo
• 21:31   Re: LIKE and Locale Stephan Szabo
• 21:34   The incompaitiblity of libpq and non-GCC compilers Dann Corbit
• 22:50   linux and anotime mount option Gaetano Mendola
• 23:07   Re: The incompaitiblity of libpq and non-GCC compilers Andrew Dunstan