Re: Update on PITR - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Update on PITR
Date
Msg-id 406B6EDB.5040406@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update on PITR  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Update on PITR  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Update on PITR  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
PITR for replication?  ("J. Andrew Rogers" <jrogers@neopolitan.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> If so, how about farming out some of it?  I'd be willing to contribute
> some effort to PITR.  (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))

What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL?  Last time I heard they weren't 
interested in their database product anymore.  Why do they care about 
the PostgreSQL project?

Of course, it's awesome that they are - but why?  What's their plan?

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: The incompaitiblity of libpq and non-GCC compilers
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Update on PITR