Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 July 2000

• 01:55   Re: select distinct Tom Lane
• 02:28   Re: Questionable coding in proc.c & lock.c Thomas Lockhart
• 02:58   pre-6.1-to-6.1 conversion procs slated for destruction Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: pg_dump & performance degradation Philip Warner
• 03:39   Hmm ... shouldn't path_distance be MIN distance not MAX distance? Tom Lane
• 03:57   Re: pg_dump & performance degradation Tom Lane
• 04:04   Re: Fwd: Postgres update Denis Perchine
• 04:58   Re: pg_dump & performance degradation Philip Warner
• 08:18   Re: [GENERAL] Database Diagram Drawing Tools ? Robert B. Easter
• 09:15   Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source Kaare Rasmussen
• 11:40   Re: pg_dump & performance degradation Don Baccus
• 12:39   Re: pg_dump & performance degradation Philip Warner
• 13:41   RE: Fwd: Postgres update Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:41   RE: bufmgr and smgr don't talk to each other, apparently Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:34   Re: pg_dump & performance degradation Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Fwd: Postgres update Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: bufmgr and smgr don't talk to each other, apparently Tom Lane
• 17:23   Anyone care about type "filename" ? Tom Lane
• 17:54   pg_dump + function/table hierarchy Kovacs Zoltan Sandor
• 18:08   Hmm, should ACL[] be toastable? Tom Lane
• 23:08   Re: pg_dump + function/table hierarchy Philip Warner
• 23:45   Re: Hmm, should ACL[] be toastable? JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)