Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

25 June 2000

• 00:02   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 00:03   Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?) Peter Eisentraut
• 01:00   Re: 64-bit sequences Tom Lane
• 01:08   Re: Interesting mention of PostgreSQL in news Lamar Owen
• 01:27   Re: About the pid and opts files Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:16   Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! Tom Lane
• 03:30   Re: About the pid and opts files Thomas Lockhart
• 03:34   Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! Thomas Lockhart
• 03:53   Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items) Thomas Lockhart
• 06:22   Re: [PORTS] Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! Adriaan Joubert
• 11:17   Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items) Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:32   Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 15:38   Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items) Thomas Lockhart
• 19:50   Maximum len of data fit into the tuple Denis Perchine
• 21:09   Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 21:34   TRUNCATE violates Referential Integrity Oliver Elphick
• 23:22   SELECT FOR UPDATE breaks unique constraint Hiroshi Inoue