Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Date
Msg-id 39558C3D.531CE848@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Hmm, that makes all kinds of sense if time_t is not the same size as
> AbsoluteTime --- which wouldn't surprise me at all on a 64-bit system.
> time_t *ought* to be 64-bits on such a machine.  The casts in that
> routine,
>                 tx = localtime((time_t *) &time);
> are obviously bogus if so.  Can anyone with an Alpha comment?

I haven't had an Alpha for a couple of years, but I *strongly* recall
that time_t is 64 bits on that machine.

               - Thomas

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: About the pid and opts files
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL_TEXT (Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items)