Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

30 March 1999

• 00:46   SELECT (CASE ... ) gives copyObject error in current CVS build. Clark Evans
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:07   RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Jackson, DeJuan
• 02:53   Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Cary O'Brien
• 02:54   Some 6.5 regression tests are failing Michael Davis
• 03:07   Create user is failing under 6.5 Michael Davis
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing Clark Evans
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing The Hermit Hacker
• 03:23   select * from pg_veiw; errors in 6.5 and 6.4.2 Michael Davis
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:12   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Thomas Lockhart
• 06:01   Re: [HACKERS] select * from pg_veiw; errors in 6.5 and 6.4.2 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:29   Regression failures Chris Bitmead
• 08:05   RE: [HACKERS] Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backe nd Peter Mount
• 08:05   Contacting me Peter Mount
• 08:14   dllist.c prlw1@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche)
• 08:14   RE: [HACKERS] Create user is failing under 6.5 Peter Mount
• 09:00   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Dmitry Samersoff
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:09   Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Chris Bitmead
• 12:16   Announcing 6.5 Beta! David O'Farrell
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Announcing 6.5 Beta! The Hermit Hacker
• 13:20   RE: [HACKERS] Create user is failing under 6.5 James Thompson
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Bruce Momjian
• 14:15   Views, aggregations, and errors Michael Davis
• 14:33   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] Regression failures Thomas Lockhart
• 15:18   Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:28   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Andrew Merrill
• 15:33   RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:42   RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:13   Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Andrew Merrill
• 16:27   RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans
• 16:44   RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:27   Interesting failure when selecting aggregates Michael Davis
• 22:02   [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Jackson, DeJuan