Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

22 May 2015

• 00:10   Re: date with month and year Paul Jungwirth
• 00:19   Re: About COPY command (and probably file fdw too) David G. Johnston
• 00:25   Re: date with month and year David G. Johnston
• 00:27   Re: date with month and year Thomas Kellerer
• 00:27   Re: date with month and year Karsten Hilbert
• 00:29   Re: Unit tests and foreign key constraints Martijn van Oosterhout
• 00:34   Re: date with month and year Paul Jungwirth
• 00:36   Re: date with month and year Brian Dunavant
• 00:41   Re: Unit tests and foreign key constraints Andy Chambers
• 00:42   Re: date with month and year Karsten Hilbert
• 01:25   RLS policy issue Ted Toth
• 01:34   Re: RLS policy issue Stephen Frost
• 03:07   Re: Enum in foreign table: error and correct way to handle. Ian Barwick
• 03:16   Re: Strange replication problem - segment restored from archive but still requested from master Venkata Balaji N
• 05:44   Re: date with month and year Adrian Klaver
• 05:46   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Bill Moran
• 05:46   Re: date with month and year Adrian Klaver
• 07:04   Re: date with month and year Alvaro Herrera
• 07:09   Re: date with month and year Adrian Klaver
• 07:55   Re: Strange replication problem - segment restored from archive but still requested from master Fujii Masao
• 11:08   Re: Strange replication problem - segment restored from archive but still requested from master Piotr Gasidło
• 11:12   Re: Strange replication problem - segment restored from archive but still requested from master Piotr Gasidło
• 11:13   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Alban Hertroys
• 11:41   Re: date with month and year Alban Hertroys
• 11:46   Re: date with month and year Tim Clarke
• 11:51   Re: Can we simulate Oracle Flashback with pg_export_snapshot()? Albe Laurenz
• 12:02   Re: date with month and year Karsten Hilbert
• 12:37   Re: Grouping By Similarity (using pg_trgm)? Oleg Bartunov
• 12:51   Different result depending on order of joins Nicklas Avén
• 13:18   Re: Different result depending on order of joins Albe Laurenz
• 13:46   Re: Different result depending on order of joins Nicklas Av\xE9n
• 16:07   Re: Different result depending on order of joins Tim Rowe
• 16:15   Re: Different result depending on order of joins Christofer C. Bell
• 16:29   Re: Different result depending on order of joins John McKown
• 16:42   Queries for unused/useless indexes Melvin Davidson
• 18:02   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: About COPY command (and probably file fdw too) Brent Wood
• 18:59   Re: date with month and year Gilles Darold
• 19:27   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Dennis Jenkins
• 19:34   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Bill Moran
• 19:36   Re: Strange replication problem - segment restored from archive but still requested from master Piotr Gasidło
• 19:37   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Bill Moran
• 19:44   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Tom Lane
• 19:57   Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for? Bill Moran
• 20:21   FW: Constraint exclusion in partitions Daniel Begin
• 20:51   Re: FW: Constraint exclusion in partitions David G. Johnston