Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

29 May 2015

• 00:36   Change UUID type default output representation Randall Lucas
• 01:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Alvaro Herrera
• 01:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Thomas Munro
• 02:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Robert Haas
• 04:01   Re: pl/python composite type array as input parameter Peter Eisentraut
• 04:08   Re: Change UUID type default output representation Peter Eisentraut
• 05:02   Re: Python 3.2 XP64 and Numpy... Adrian Klaver
• 05:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Alvaro Herrera
• 06:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Alvaro Herrera
• 06:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Robert Haas
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Thomas Munro
• 15:54   Re: Fwd: Raster performance PT
• 16:39   Planner cost adjustments Daniel Begin
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: Planner cost adjustments Melvin Davidson
• 19:20   Re: Planner cost adjustments Tomas Vondra
• 19:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Robert Haas
• 20:35   Between with a list of ranges possible ? Arup Rakshit
• 20:41   Re: Between with a list of ranges possible ? John R Pierce
• 20:43   Re: Between with a list of ranges possible ? Andreas Kretschmer
• 20:46   Re: Between with a list of ranges possible ? Raymond O'Donnell
• 20:46   Re: Between with a list of ranges possible ? John R Pierce
• 20:54   Re: Between with a list of ranges possible ? Stephen Cook
• 21:10   Re: Between with a list of ranges possible ? John McKown
• 21:38   Re: Fwd: Raster performance David Haynes II
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Robert Haas
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 Bruce Momjian
• 23:34   Re: Planner cost adjustments PT
• 23:44   Re: Fwd: Raster performance PT
• 23:56   Re: Planner cost adjustments Daniel Begin