Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

21 October 2013

• 00:25   Re: Preserving the source code of views Tom Lane
• 02:10   Re: [ADMIN] what's the efficient/safest way to convert database character set ? Huang, Suya
• 04:19   Re: [ADMIN] what's the efficient/safest way to convert database character set ? John R Pierce
• 05:35   Re: Preserving the source code of views Brian Crowell
• 05:39   Re: Preserving the source code of views Brian Crowell
• 05:45   Re: Preserving the source code of views Brian Crowell
• 07:40   Re: Preserving the source code of views Pavel Stehule
• 08:49   Re: when do I analyze after concurrent index creation? dinesh kumar
• 10:51   pg_dump doesn't restore on newer database due to schema issues (bug or limitation?) Ken Tanzer
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] Who is pgFoundery administrator? KONDO Mitsumasa
• 13:33   Re: Links in docs broken Peter Eisentraut
• 13:50   Re: streaming replication: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer Albe Laurenz
• 16:55   Re: pg_dump doesn't restore on newer database due to schema issues (bug or limitation?) Adrian Klaver
• 17:47   Re: pg_dump doesn't restore on newer database due to schema issues (bug or limitation?) Tom Lane
• 18:11   pg_dump resulting in excessive memory use by postmaster process Ben
• 18:27   Re: Preserving the source code of views Stephen Frost
• 18:33   Re: pg_dump resulting in excessive memory use by postmaster process Stephen Frost
• 18:52   Re: Preserving the source code of views Ian Lawrence Barwick
• 19:17   Re: pg_dump resulting in excessive memory use by postmaster process Ben
• 19:33   Re: pg_dump resulting in excessive memory use by postmaster process Stephen Frost
• 19:40   locks held during commit with synchronous replication Torsten Förtsch
• 19:43   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Moshe Jacobson
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] Who is pgFoundery administrator? Merlin Moncure
• 20:44   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Merlin Moncure
• 20:57   Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 ramistuni
• 21:00   Report the trigger name when complaining about "tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command"? Joe Van Dyk
• 21:01   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE David Johnston
• 21:07   Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 John R Pierce
• 21:12   Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 David Johnston
• 21:46   Re: locks held during commit with synchronous replication Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 ramistuni
• 22:15   Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 John R Pierce
• 22:30   Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 John R Pierce
• 22:40   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Moshe Jacobson
• 22:51   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE David Johnston
• 22:58   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE Merlin Moncure
• 23:56   Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE David Johnston