Re: GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Subject Re: GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking
Date
Msg-id xuyk86ibqpf.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking  ("Martin A. Marques" <martin@math.unl.edu.ar>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> Here is an article about GPL and GPL version 3.0.
> 
>
http://icd.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&SubSection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=92350&VERSION_NUM=1
> 
> The interesting thing is that Stallman says:
> 
>   "Our position is that it makes no difference whether programs are linked
>   statically or dynamically," explains Stallman. "Either one makes a
>   combined program.
> 
> This would seem to imply that our dynamic linking of libreadline in
> PostgreSQL backend binaries makes the distribution of backend binaries
> fall under the GPL.

This was discussed extensively earlier. Linking dynamically or
statically doesn't make a difference in the case of a library, but as
long as readline is an optional feature for the user it's not a
problem. 


-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: beta5 ...
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: RE: beta5 ...