Re: pg_restore takes ages - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: pg_restore takes ages
Date
Msg-id x73ceav24m.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_restore takes ages  (Alex <alex@meerkatsoft.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore takes ages
Re: pg_restore takes ages
List pgsql-general
>>>>> "SD" == Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> writes:

SD> You can try creating index/triggers first and load the data. At the
SD> end it will take a while before you get a usable database with either
SD> approach but see what works faster for you.

The triggers and FK's don't do much at the time they are created.
They work upon update/insert/delete of data.

SD> footprint. I dropped the table and recreated it. Also created index
SD> before loading data. The loading was slow with this approach but it
SD> finished in 3 hours. And I had an updated index as well. Just had to
SD> run vacuum over it.

I cannot believe that this was faster than load data followed by
create index.  Perhaps you needed to bump sort_mem so the index could
be created more efficiently.  I also find that bumping up
checkpoint_segments to a high number speeds things up considerably.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: book on advanced postgresql?
Next
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore takes ages