On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>> could not accept connection from the standby because max_wal_senders is 0 > >> Well, that might still leave someone confused if they had one standby >> and were trying to bring up a second one. > > I'd suggest something like "number of requested standby connections > exceeds max_wal_senders (currently %d)"
Oh, that's much better than anything I thought of. +1.
