Bruce,
> The following patch adds --maxindfuncparams to configure to allow you
> to
> more easily set the maximum number of function parameters and columns
> in an index. (Can someone come up with a better name?)
How about simply --max_params ?
> Are we staying at 16 as the default? I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty,
I'd vote for that. But then, you knew that. John Proctor wants 128.
>and that we should increase
> NAMEDATALEN to 64.
I don't even know that is.
-Josh
